Continuand propunerea mai veche a parintului Petru, propun sa incepem o discutie pe psalmi, daca avem dileme, nelamuriri, samd.
Dechid discutia cu o dilema personala privind Psalmul 1.
Fericitul Augustin inainteza ideea ca Psalmul 1 vorbeste despre Hristos. Trebuie spus ca din ceea ce am citit la Fericitul Augustin, acesta gaseste in fiecare psalm ceva legat de Hristos.
“Blessed is the man that hath not gone away in the counsel of the ungodly” (ver. 1). This is to be understood of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord Man. “Blessed is the man that hath not gone away in the counsel of the ungodly,” as “the man of earth did,” who consented to his wife deceived by the serpent, to the transgressing the commandment of God. “Nor stood in the way of sinners.”
Fericitul Ieronim, ca majoritatea altor Parinti, spune ca in nici un caz nu poate fi vorba de Hristos:
Some commentators think that the key to this first psalm must be the person of Christ our Lord, interpreting the happy man to be the man, Christ. They mean well, of course, but such an interpretation certainly shows a lack of experience and knowledge, for if that happy man is Christ, and Christ gave the law, how can the words: “But delights in the law of the Lord” apply to Christ? Besides, how can Christ be compared to a tree where it says: “He is like a tree planted near running water”? For if Christ is compared to a tree, He is less than the tree since in a comparison the thing compared is less than that to which it is compared;
Prin urmare, putem vorbi de o posibilitatea ca interpretarea mesianica sa fie valida? Si stim ca majoritatea psalmilor au doua trei chei de intelegere, cel putin.